Thursday, April 21, 2011

Senior year is free, bored, talk about the idea of ​​hair sets configuration Speak up

have carefully read the December 2009 under the CPU final year. One test shows great length the various CPU performance under testing software ranking summary back to a lot of good advice. While a year ago, but given the structure are not updated, only slightly lower frequency of U instead of the, CPU's, or did not change the basic market. Ever since they took out to read through carefully and then say something.
from the inside point of view of various test software tests to compare the results of a representative from the CineBench R10, Frtiz Chess Benchmark given, because both programs more comprehensive study on the processor, floating-point operations, memory, system bandwidth performance requirements are more demanding. Other software is because the single-threaded test, or less demanding on memory, or bandwidth, strict test, the results are not comprehensive.
test result is too complicated, according to availability, make a few personal summary of conclusions:
1, ultra-high end INTEL victory in the 3000 + price, the performance reached the limit of the peak, after all, not
2, the high end INTEL really should not be underestimated, I5 750, I7 920 high performance, but considering the slightly lower performance a little bit AMD Phenom II X4 965 cheaper more cost-effective, so that the wise see wisdom eyes of the beholder the. I think the money is, I5 750 + P55 is the most important. Performance is strong enough, then the problem will not bring the high price of X58, after all, four card crossfire, 8 threads, and more to improve the bus speed of performance is limited, cost is almost unlimited.
3, the end of the processor completely biased AMD, Tian Ji's horse racing has been a good market strategy of expression, INTEL E8400 only high-frequency dual-core support, the performance lost Phenom II X3, Athlon II X4, cost-effective nature can not.
4, the low-end AMD processor is more invincible, Athlon II X3's performance is completely subvert the E5400, the price is the same.
If I choose, I would choose the side of the Athlon II X4 630 (now the market is X4 640), 600 yuan price, buy a quad-core processor Although the price reduction is slow because of the absence of the three, but three did not slow the performance of the CPU play a decisive role, after all, a large-scale compute-intensive needs of ordinary users is small. Athlon II X4 performance in the test results in in the middle and upper, performance, ease of par three Phenom II X4, victory INTEL dual core.
the same price to buy only to sell INTEL CORE LGA775 micro-architecture dual-core E7400, now this time, do not support multi-core software and games there? Moreover LGA775 endangered the future scalability minimal.
(As an aside, INTEL is not really never considered upgrading of the year for the three kinds of interfaces, from 775-1366-1156-1155, more cattle are not compatible with 1155 and 1156 most cattle is the memory card inside the controller are integrated into the CPU, the Northbridge is gone, the light of a south bridge you have to so much money, the board price increase, should we buy your U let you earn so much, let you earn to buy a board so much time after the upgrade had to change with the U plate, you really will challenge the intelligence of Chinese consumers. the other hand, AMD, from AM2 to AM2 + to AM3, the interface changed only from 940 to 938 , brush BOIS to be compatible, a very affordable motherboard also compatible with the new U for several years.)

Therefore, devaluation CPU Athlon II X4 640! Dual-core prices, Guards performance, unbeatable value for money, other god horse competitors, it was all cloud. . . Cloud. . . Highly recommended.
parameters are as follows: 3.0GHz = 200MHz * 14X, two slow 2MB, three slow loss, HT4.0 bus, 45nm, AM3 interface, 938 pin, TDP95W, price of 610 yuan.

The chipset choice, because I would not consider this kind of thing was set, but also not going to pay for no access to technology and the chip, 880,890 no longer consider the range of natural within, it must choose a good motherboard 870 in the work.
Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 is such a motherboard, AMD 870 + SB850 chipset, AM3 interface, 8 +2 phase power supply, ATX big board, PCB twice the copper, you can dual-card Crossfire, provides technical Ka 333 technology (USB3.0, SATA 3.0 and three times the USB interface, power supply) 850 Southbridge supports RAID 0,1,5,10 JOBD native function. Price of 770 yuan.
for this board, my feeling is that although the price of your side a little, but better scalability. After the performance such as the U is not enough, because the 8 +2 phase power supply, no problem upgrading X6 1090T, 1090T then of course the price must fall enough to be accepted. If graphics performance is not enough, the fighting does fit support, which will see the time to renew a card or a more cost-effective high cost of a card. For USB3.0, although because of INTEL's stingy, only adding third-party chip, but the performance is already a very strong. RAID 0 to be practical, electrical and electronic development for so many years, progress was undoubtedly the slowest cell, followed by the hard disk should be, right? Did not increase the speed of the says slowly, so RAID 0 is very practical, this hard drive can provide a strong exchange of fire transmission speed.


For graphics, I tend to wander between the ATI and NV, after all, their relationship is almost like INTEL and AMD did the same, NV had a high profile in the graphics industry, 9800GTX + night forced into a 4850 thousand blast down, but also became the first release 5870,5770 DX11, but also into the peak performance of 480, but in the end to restore missing, but now re-NV GTX460 possession passed the mid-market, performance, cost-effective balance Let GTX460 has become the first choice for doing my part now temporary.
taking into account the GTX480's performance, both compute-intensive games and brought a high power, high prices, NV will chip very smart little effect on the game, the greatest effect on the scientific computing some of the unit removed, thus reducing power consumption, lower prices, so that most players GTX460 a favorite product, saying 336SP, 256BIT, GDDR5 of 4000MHZ, but also their physical fitness to become king in the end, right? ZOTAC GTX460-1GD5
first produced, prices higher than the 100-200 mass products, but considering the use of a third party AC, TWIN PRO dual fan radiator opening four heat pipes, and its 27 degrees idle , full 47 degrees, the fan is always 40% RPM's ability to make people have to consider this cold and quiet of the product. Unless you really are Colorful, Onda these , even if the second line, buy a Galaxy also, do not take into account the above-mentioned companies, there is no technical capacity will not cut corners and blowing.

CPU cooler choice for Aeolus products, do not explain. Under pressure to consider the alpha / beta 200 (60) / 400 (110), side-blown ice considered 400 (160 yuan) / Frostsaber Extreme (280 million), the most important ice 400, provided that you have the wind in your case Road confidence.

chassis devaluation TT V3 BLACK EDITION, the price of 300 yuan to provide a the black of the power under the home, back alignment, anti-theft feature. Great to know these features only appear in the 500 + high-end chassis. Compare it to say that the shortage is only minor, such as small size definitely better than high-end boxes, acrylic transparent part is also small, still have to manually add dust dust cotton. But these are basically irrelevant, or easy to resolve. Moreover, the chassis is a hedge against inflation goods, bought a good heat, good for the life of the hardware inside, he does not depreciate.

speakers do not understand, after all, have heard too little, but the speakers really get what you pay, but also hedge goods bought you enjoy the sound quality is the price you out measure, but even over 5 years, this box will not cut prices.

hope to provide advice, ideas, criticism.

No comments:

Post a Comment